Skip to content

Conversation

@SpecLad
Copy link
Contributor

@SpecLad SpecLad commented Dec 25, 2025

For #4087.

The problematic footnotes are actually referenced, the syntax is just slightly incorrect.

  • Change is either:
    • To a Draft PEP
    • To an Accepted or Final PEP, with Steering Council approval
    • To fix an editorial issue (markup, typo, link, header, etc)
  • PR title prefixed with PEP number (e.g. PEP 123: Summary of changes)

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4759.org.readthedocs.build/

For python#4087.

The problematic footnotes are actually referenced, the syntax is just slightly
incorrect.
@SpecLad SpecLad requested a review from ncoghlan as a code owner December 25, 2025 19:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant