Skip to content

Conversation

@yanglbme
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 21, 2025 23:31
@idoocs idoocs added core team Issues or pull requests from core team js Issues or Pull requests relate to .js code md Issues or Pull requests relate to .md files ts Issues or Pull requests relate to .ts code labels Dec 21, 2025
@yanglbme yanglbme merged commit ad034a8 into main Dec 21, 2025
14 of 15 checks passed
@yanglbme yanglbme deleted the dev branch December 21, 2025 23:32
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This pull request adds comprehensive solutions to three LeetCode problems from the 116th weekly contest: problems 0962 (Maximum Width Ramp), 0963 (Minimum Area Rectangle II), and 0964 (Least Operators to Express Number).

  • Implements monotonic stack solution for finding maximum width ramps in O(n) time complexity
  • Adds geometric algorithm for finding minimum area rectangles with arbitrary rotation angles
  • Provides dynamic programming with memoization approach for minimizing operators to express numbers

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
solution/0900-0999/0962.Maximum Width Ramp/ Added monotonic stack solution in Python, Java, C++, Go, TypeScript, and JavaScript with complete problem documentation in both Chinese and English
solution/0900-0999/0963.Minimum Area Rectangle II/ Implemented O(n³) solution for finding minimum area rectangle with support for rotated rectangles, including hash-based point lookup optimization
solution/0900-0999/0964.Least Operators to Express Number/ Added recursive DFS solution with memoization to minimize operators needed to express target numbers

Note: I identified a potential bug in the C++ implementation of problem 0962 where the loop condition for (int i = n - 1; i; --i) terminates at i=1 instead of i=0, which differs from all other language implementations (Python, Java, Go, TypeScript, JavaScript) that iterate through index 0. However, I was unable to store this as a comment because the actual diff/changes are not available in the review context.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core team Issues or pull requests from core team js Issues or Pull requests relate to .js code md Issues or Pull requests relate to .md files ts Issues or Pull requests relate to .ts code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants